MOON-PAIN
‘Che
canta?'-‘Who's singing?' The opera aficionado's question takes on another
resonance in Moon-pain,
or several. At the start come sounds that could be the scrapings and
scribblings of so many pens, awaiting the presence of someone-the singer-who
will not just draw words but voice them, embody them. But are the instruments
preparing a space for the singer, or are they, almost from the first,
infiltrating that space? Or again, are they not rather designing a space that
is empty and will remain so, a space that the singer, the singing voice, will
not be able to occupy, perhaps will not try to occupy? This is a strange song
cycle, disquieting for all its beauty-disquieting even in its beauty. ‘Here',
the composer writes of Pessoa's poetry, ‘dreams and dream visions
are woven, braided, tangled and knit together in a
marvellous tissue of notes, colours, moods, sounds, pulses, ripples on a
moonlit lake surface-and transience; a web of polyphonic, multifaceted
transience.' So it is in these settings; listeners will encounter further
layers of braidings, marvellous colours, moonlit lake ripples and, to be sure,
polyphonic transience. The already mentioned opening has plenty of these
things: wafts and trills, gestures falling into silence, corners suddenly
turned (the tritone in the piano) and, possibly most of all, repetitions that
only emphasize transience in their efforts to withstand it, to hold on to a
present that is constantly falling into the past. But listeners will be
invited, also, to ponder a fragile subjectivity and to wonder if they are not
looking into-listening into-a mirror.
We may begin, as the composer did, with
words:
Weep, violin and viol,
Low flute and fine bassoon.
This distich does not quite give Jørgensen his
instrumentation but it certainly gives him some sounds, a tone and, more than
these, a dislocation of time and personality. We are entering not only a
dreamscape but also a realm where the contemporary is fused with the ancient
(‘viol', and other diction belonging more to the sixteenth century than the
twentieth). This is a world, too, where the words themselves seem more alive,
more determined, than the voice uttering them. Assonance, rhythm and rhyme push
the poem on, in the seeming absence of a controlling will. Introduction of the
ostensible speaker is delayed until the second stanza (‘I wander': a point to
note in the setting, whose tempo is indeed that of wandering, the predominant
speed of this wandering, wondering work). Meanwhile, and even after, it is the
words that speak the poem.
Could one
say equally that the notes sing the song? The singer is given her first note by
the piano, a middle register G. She is then drawn up to hold the B a third
above (‘vi-') and drawn up again to hold the D a fifth above (‘and'), the piano
all the time reiterating the G. So we have in succession the notes of a G major
triad, a memory imposing itself not from the singer's will, since its
foundation comes from the piano, and not especially from the music's will,
since this is not a G major that goes anywhere. The memory arrives, rather, as
if of itself, an echo that refuses to be forgotten. If, as already suggested,
the present is always fading into the past in this music, despite all attempts
to keep it alive, the past is declining to accept its pastness-not at all
because it is being artificially revived but because it is simply there, and
its presence is admitted. Waking, we may naively feel a sheer divide between
the present, which we are experiencing, and the past, which we are not. Dreaming,
we know better. ‘I wander.' The I, the sense of self, wanders. Such is the self
of Moon-pain, wandering-a self, it may even be, wandering
within itself.
And it may
also be a self wandering outside, into where it has no place. Moon-pain has six movements, but its boundaries turn out to be porous, if not
rapacious, and here it engulfs four more segments. Its first movement, composed
in 2003-4 (as was its fifth), is followed not by its second, of 2005-6, but by
the opening movement of a work the composer completed in the interim, in 2005: Goblin Dance, for clarinet and piano. The voice has gone now.
But the notes are still here, singing the music, and the repetitions persist (a
high Bb in the piano nags almost all through),
together with representings of the past. A closer connection will, too, emerge.
Now comes the second movement of Moon-pain, but it is not entirely a return. As will happen repeatedly, the
instrumental ensemble has focussed on a classic formation, in this case the
flute quartet, moving through much finer textures-and also, uniquely, excluding
the echo chamber of the piano. At the same time, the voice has changed. French
words are invading the poem, and extreme sounds, though all taken within an
unearthly calm that survives from the first movement. (It is remarkable how
little one is reminded of another instance of musical moon-pain, scored for
such similar resources: Pierrot lunaire.)
Now we go back to Goblin
Dance for that work's second movement, an ‘Aria' consisting
of short ideas (some remembering the first movement, including the high Bb) to be assembled by the performers according to guidelines supplied
by the composer. Then comes another surprise. Or is it?-for there is an
inevitability in how the third movement of Moon-pain, added in 2007, not only goes on with the subsumed angst of the
second but also reworks, wholesale, the first movement of Goblin
Dance, adding voice and cello, to recreate the
instrumentation of trios by Beethoven and Brahms. The Goblin
Dance movement (track 2) becomes revealed as the
shadow of this Moon-pain
movement (track 5)-unless the song is the shadow of the dance, the dance that
moved so edgily towards dance, which it undertook only briefly before moving
on. However, the Moon-pain
movement is longer, going on into a vocal remake of the opening of the third
movement of Goblin Dance, with its motif that will haunt much of the rest of the work, and
that here quietly repeats around these haunting lines:
There we shall awhile gain
All the elusive selves
We can never obtain.
Since the ensuing movement is the full Goblin Dance finale, the mood goes on unbroken, to swivel with the next Moon-pain movement, also written in 2007 (‘Spirit Beams'). A more startling
change comes with the succeeding track, a montage created by the composer from
recordings of street sounds in Lisbon, voices speaking Pessoa texts in several
languages, pen strokes indeed, and strands from elsewhere in the album,
including at the end a little phrase we have been taught to recognize. This
extraordinary intervention suggests the work scanning the world outside, and
finding eventually its own reflection.
One might feel that the fifth movement
of Moon-pain-one of the two
original settings, and a piece that both restores the full ensemble and
transfigures (or discloses the roots of) elements from other movements-has the
sense of a finale. However, the ending is yet to come-or perhaps will never
come, for the movement that follows is another reworking, this time entire, of
the Goblin Dance finale. In bidding us adieu, the work asks us to continue its
wandering search. And surely it is not really saying farewell at all, but
indicating it will stay with us.
Paul
Griffiths, 2009
In his most important work to date, the song cycle Moon-pain (2003-8) for mezzo-soprano and chamber ensemble, Klaus Ib Jørgensen (b. 1967) has set the moonlit, dreaming poems of the Portuguese poet Fernando Pessoa (1888-1935) to music that is both beautiful and disturbing. The six movements of the work are interwoven here with two other, related compositions: Goblin Dance (2005) for clarinet and piano, and Lisbon Revisited (2008) – a soundscape from the streets of Lisbon, a poem by Pessoa in a variety of languages, and fragments of the Moon-pain music. This is the sound of the maternity ward of this poetry.